BBC Education News is reporting on the introduction of the “Asian Maths Method” to primary schools.

Don’t get me wrong – I’m not against new approaches, whether they are from Asia, Mars, or the next classroom along. We should always be open-minded, prepared to experiment and to amend what we do.

But what always bugs me is the sloppy thinking. The article talks about functional innumeracy being much lower in Shanghai, Singapore and Hong Kong than in the UK.

Yes, that is interesting and perhaps raises some questions. But why assume it is automatically because of the use of a specific method? Couldn’t other factors be more important? For example, cultural factors such as how education is viewed, how frowned on innumeracy is, and how much support and reinforcement is offered at home can be hugely important to success. And even restricting it to educational methods – would you expect levels of functional innumeracy at 15 to be solely explicable from methods used in primary school?

Read on | The Accidental Teacher


Previous articleToo old to attend that gig and rock it with the band?
Next articleThe face in the mirror
Cath Brown
I am a secondary school maths (mainly) teacher. I’m also a “leisure” OU student studying mainly chemistry courses – you may have come across me on some of the OUSA forums, as I tend to have a lot to say for myself! My blog will hopefully add a little to your picture of the life of a teacher – it’s meant to be helpful to OU students considering or aiming for teaching. So it’ll be a mixture of an account of what I’ve been doing at work from day to day, with some general thoughts on teaching, schools and education in general.